Photography studio, gallery and training complex

A Permit To Photograph In The Park? Really?

Last Thursday, a group of CLUB and f2 members and myself went to Birmingham‘s lovely Cannon Hill park for a fun shoot with demurely-attired model Vera Ping. The rain stopped, the clouds cleared and the scene was set for some lovely portrait shots.

We headed initially for the park’s victorian bandstand (thinking that if it did start raining again, at least we’d be under cover) and began shooting, trying to avoid getting the bandstand’s two sleeping-bagged homeless people in the background. We stayed there for a while until the sun really came through and headed off to a location where we might better be able to take advantage of the beautiful (if unexpected) early evening light.

So we found a bench a few hundred yards away and started using that. The low warm light and reflector produced some gorgeous images of Vera. At this point, a man on the next bench, who had been watching us for a few minutes walked away, only to return to the bench about five minutes later. Shortly afterwards I was tapped on the shoulder by a park ranger, asking what we were doing. I explained that we were a group on an outing from a local photography club to take some pictures in the park. He asked me if I had a permit to take photographs in the park. I said I was unaware that a permit was needed.

He asked me for ID or a business card, which I gave him, and said I could expect a call from a Mr. Cooper (presumably at Birmingham City Council) who was the person that I would henceforth need to contact for permission to photograph in the park.

I asked if it was really forbidden for people to take photographs and he said “well, it is for professionals”. I explained that I was the only professional there and I wasn’t actually taking pictures (a small fib – I’d taken about a dozen). He said it wasn’t a problem this time but that I needed a permit in future. I explained that I was a photography tutor at mac (which is situated in the park) and regularly used the park for classes – was I to take it that I would no longer be allowed to do this and all future courses should be held completely indoors? The ranger, who gave his name as “Sergeant…” (exactly how he came by this pseudo-military rank when working for the council I have yet to work out) then left, after saying goodbye to the man on the bench, who it seems might’ve been the one who alerted the sergeant to the nefarious and scandalous use of cameras in the park.

Not the actual sergeant

In the event, we had more or less already finished by then, as the sun dipped behind the trees and it began spotting with rain. We headed inside.

There were no children around, and if there had been, the assembled photographers were better placed than most members of the public to compose images so as to exclude them from shots. The backgrounds for these shots were, mainly, trees, so not exactly potential terrorist targets.

My problem with this situation, apart from becoming an all-too-regular occurrence for photographers in the UK, is this…

  • Where was the sign displayed stating that photography (by professionals or anyone else) in the park was forbidden?
  • I am a professional photographer 24/7. Am I never again allowed to take photographs in a park?
  • Why were we singled out when there were people sleeping in the bandstand, and gangs of youths effing and jeffing within earshot?

One can only imagine that the notoriously skint Brum Council have now sunk to the level of demanding a form of “protection money” from photographers, who are, let’s face it, a nice soft target. Or perhaps, as was the case in a similar incident with English Heritage last year, they don’t want anyone taking the same pictures that can be bought at the gift shop, or taken at one of their own photography events.

Perhaps I should have been prepared and downloaded a “Bust Card” from those nice peeps at “I’m a Photographer, not a terrorist”

Get yours at


4 responses

  1. Ray

    I think you handled that much better than I would have especially the park ranger referring to himself as sergeant

    July 15, 2011 at 10:32 pm

    • As an epilogue to this story, I was with my mac group in Cannon Hill Park last Monday and saw TWO photoshoots taking place (one a “mock-up” wedding shoot, and the other students photographing lampshades hanging from a tree). Strangely, Sergeant Brassneck was nowhere to be seen…

      October 9, 2011 at 9:29 am

  2. The real reason likely why is because that park ranger is not really a ranger even though to your full 3D senses he is.

    The park ranger or *Sargent* as he likes to be called is an *energy* vampire designed to suck positive energy out of people.
    To start off with: Vampires exists but the part about biting you to make you become one is full on baloney to purposely bring disinformation to the truth about them so you will think they don’t exist.

    From what I have understood they can *smell* their victims a mile away and their goal is to feed upon positive energy which will drain the victim and make them stronger.

    A common way they appear is when they seem to single someone out in an event by trying to out smart you in some way to make you give in to your emotional attatchment to whatever the problem is………. which in this case your lucky it wasn’t a Cop that could’ve tried arresting you and you’d have to deal with a court case and be forced to explain to a judge and the judge would either dismiss your case or the *ticket* not even being real at all when you try to pay the fine for not having a permit.

    July 28, 2011 at 2:43 am

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s