Photography studio, gallery and training complex

The Trouble With Photography Magazines…

20120409-212133.jpg

I was thumbing through a few of the photo magazines that I picked up from Focus On Imaging and I made a rather alarming discovery.

One of the magazines, which I won’t name but is apparently aimed at the professional end of the photography market, listed it’s production team and even provided a short profile of each. Quite a nice idea you might think, and you’d be right… But this is (with the actual names changed) what the profiles said about the people putting together this monthly magazine:

Person 1: Five years experience in magazine design and has been with team since 2010.
Person 2: Freelanced as a travel writer and edited and online magazine for two years.
Person 3: Just graduated with a journalism degree and is making her first steps in the magazine industry.

Can you spot anything missing?

How about the word “photography”? Or “photographer”?

It seems to me that none of these people has any experience of photography whatsoever. Does that worry you? Should it? Just because you know your photographing onions doesn’t necessarily make you the ideal candidate for putting together an entertaining and informative magazine – far from it.

This is a slick magazine, stylish to look at and clearly with high production values that are designed to impress as it stares at you from the newsagents’ shelf. But personally, I prefer to read magazines that are “passion-led”, even if this means they are a bit rough around the edges in other areas.

I know that I’m guilty if banging on about Silvershotz magazine rather a lot but it has to be said that its editor, Clive, is clearly passionate about photography and scours the globe for cutting-edge innovative photography. Silvershotz has more than the odd typo, arrives too late for some of the events it advertises, has the world’s weirdest editioning system, and doesn’t (sorry, Clive) always look as glossy as some of the monthlys. But I love it.

What worries me about many of the monthly photographic mags is this:
The cover of the magazine I’m discussing has an image of a smokey, long exposure seascape, of exactly the sort that appeared in the same magazine twenty years or so ago when I knew no better than to hang on their every word/suggestion/tip.
The growing reliance on images submitted to the mag’s website. After all, why go looking for edgy contemporary images from artists who might charge for use of their images when hundreds merrily upload their passable efforts for you to publish free of charge?
The tendency towards tutorial articles which are, in effect, actually “advertorials” for a sponsor’s product.

In short, one sees the same cliched images and recycled tips year in, year out. Even when a “real” photographer is brought in to provide some credibility to a page or three, there is a bias towards the photographers who make the most noise – rather than those who take the best photographs. But most of all, what are we to learn from people who are producing images no better than our own? Would it not be better to be exposed to those who operate on a totally different level – that we can aspire to be like – that will open our eyes to new and unexplored opportunities?

When I was just starting out in photography, I must admit that there are some things that I learned from magazines, but once past that basic level I wonder if this “visual nepotism”, this reliance on the safe and easy rather than the challenging and inspirational doesn’t actually hinder a photographer’s creative development.

Advertisements

5 responses

  1. After reading this very well worded article, I can say that I absolutely and utterly agree with every sentiment. I’m a Wedding, Model and Music Photographer and I HAVE to buy photography magazines because I simply cannot afford to go on expensive (and often overpriced) courses. I but such magazines for hints and tips and sometimes inspiration but I do find all the magazines focus mainly on advertising rather than “passion”. I would much rather read a mag with a few grammatical errors that is put together with sincerity and love than a magazine devoid of any emotion whatsoever.

    Great article. Really enjoyed reading it.

    Lucy

    April 11, 2012 at 7:58 am

    • Thank you Lucy! I sometimes think I might just be a grumpy old man but your comment has made me think that maybe I’m not alone in some of my opinions.

      April 12, 2012 at 7:37 am

      • No, not at all! I’m with you on this one. Slight typo with my name by the way. My surname is Onions

        April 12, 2012 at 7:58 am

      • Thought so. Nice website!! 🙂

        April 12, 2012 at 12:25 pm

      • Awwwwww, thank you so much. Thank you for taking the time to have a look. Means a lot

        April 12, 2012 at 3:36 pm

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s